Publications<< Back

Núñez J, Sanchis J, Núñez E, Bodí V, Bertomeu-González V, Bosch MJ, Santas E, Fácila L, Chorro FJ, Gómez C, Consuegra L, Llàcer A

Prognostic differences between routine invasive and conservative strategies for the management of high-risk, non-ST segment acute coronary syndromes: Experience from two consecutive periods in a single center.

Eur. J. Intern. Med.. 2007 Sep;18(5):409-16, PMID: 17693230

The optimal revascularization strategy for non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) remains controversial, especially in a real world context. The objective of this work was to assess differences at 1 year in all-cause mortality and the composite endpoint of mortality or acute myocardial infarction (MI) between two management strategies for NSTE-ACS: a conservative strategy (CS) versus a routine invasive strategy (RIS).